Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
a b "Suiphilus" (17 February 1815). "Joanna Southcott and the Pig-faced Woman". The Times. No.9947. London. col B, p.3. The other significant theory about the origin of the legend, proposed by Robert Chambers in 1864, is that a genuine child was born in the early 17th century with facial deformities resembling a pig's face and a speech impediment causing her to grunt. [1] The science of teratology (the study of birth defects and physiological abnormalities) was then in its infancy, and the theory of maternal impression (that the thoughts of a pregnant woman could influence the future appearance of her children) was widely accepted. It is possible that the birth of a genuinely deformed child led to the story of the beggar as a possible explanation for her appearance, with other elements of the story being later additions or distortions by publishers. [1] Chambers speculates that the original child may have had a similar appearance to Julia Pastrana, a woman with hypertrichosis and distorted (although not pig-like) facial features, [1] who was widely exhibited in Europe and North America until her death in 1860, and then, embalmed, until the 1970s. [7] However, while a 1952 stillbirth with a face resembling a pig is documented, there has never been a reliably documented case of a human with deformities of this kind surviving outside the womb, while all versions of the pig-faced woman legend describe her as a healthy adult. [8] Tannakin Skinker [ edit ] Tannakin Skinker, from A Monstrous Shape, or a Shapelesse Monster, 1640 Passenger Mr. Cole reported not seeing the device when he entered the compartment, and stated that the ‘explosion had taken place as he was preparing to leave the carriage at Walworth, and that the tube must have been lying on the seat near the door, for the flame slightly singed his left whiskers.’
None too subtly, the coroner examining Chapman’s case suggested the murderer had displayed “Judas-like approaches.” Police hauled John Pizer, a second generation Polish Jew, into custody on suspicion of being “Leather Apron,” releasing him when his alibi was shown to be irrefutable.The Wilde trials caused public attitudes toward homosexuals to become harsher and less tolerant. Whereas prior to the trials there was a certain pity for those who engaged in same-sex passion, after the trials homosexuals were seen more as a threat, more as predators. The Wilde trials had other effects as well. They caused the public to begin to associate art with homo-eroticism, and to see effeminacy as a signal for homosexuality. Many same sex relationships seen as innocent before the Wilde trials became suspect after the trials. After the Wilde trials, every male relationship of any intensity came under a cloud, every effeminate gesture raised an eyebrow, and the arts and homosexuality became linked in the public mind. People with close same sex relationships grew anxious, concerned about doing anything that might suggest impropriety. Facing her in another panel is Ferdinand VII, shown with a mule's head. Ferdinand sits on a wooden throne, with a chamber pot filled with holy water at his feet. On the wall behind him, a painting shows Ferdinand (again with a mule's head) watching a mass execution; a monk says "Here's some more patriots", and Ferdinand replies "O! That's right kill 'em kill 'em". The caption to Ferdinand's image reads: Burton, William Evans (September 1837). "Scissibles". Burton's Gentleman's Magazine. Philadelphia. 1 (3).
When Carson announced, in his opening speech in defense of Queensberry, that he intended to call to the witness box a procession of young men with whom Wilde had been sexually associated, the atmosphere in the courtroom became tense. Edward Clarke understood not only that his client's libel case was lost, but that his client was at serious risk of being prosecuted himself. An 1895 Act, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, had made it a crime for any person to commit an act of "gross indecency." The Act had been interpreted to criminalize any form of sexual activity between members of the same sex. The resource can be viewed in full digital facsimile form, with copious advertisements, news stories and images that capture 20th century culture and society. It is safe to say that no fog machine suppliers ever went bankrupt providing fog machines for the various movies there have been on the case!a b c "Editorial". The Times. No.9446. London. 16 February 1815. col G, p.3. (subscription required) While stories of pig-faced women vary in detail, they have the same basic form. A pregnant noblewoman is approached by a beggar and her children, whom she dismisses, making some comparison of the beggar's children to pigs as she does so. The beggar curses the pregnant noblewoman, and come the birth of her child it is a girl, healthy and perfectly formed in every respect other than having the face of a pig. [1] Shpayer-Makov, Haia, ‘Journalists and Police Detectives in Victorian and Edwardian England: An Uneasy Reciprocal Relationship’, Journal of Social History, 42:4 (2009), pp. 963-987. The 1814–15 Pig-faced Lady craze in London and the subsequent hoax in Paris were the last occasions in which the mainstream press reported the existence of pig-faced women as fact. [62] By the 1860s the fad for exhibiting "pig-faced women" at fairs was losing popularity, [3] although they continued to be exhibited until at least the 1880s. [2] By the year 2000 the legend was almost forgotten. [62] The victims themselves were photographed in the aftermaths of their various murders. This was done in the hope that, by showing these photographs around, the police might be able to identify them.
The magical elements gradually vanished from the story, and the existence of pig-faced women began to be treated as fact. The story became particularly widespread in Dublin in the early 19th century, where it became widely believed that reclusive 18th-century philanthropist Griselda Steevens had kept herself hidden from view because she had the face of a pig. In late 1814 and early 1815, rumour swept London that a pig-faced woman was living in Marylebone. Her existence was widely reported as fact, and numerous alleged portraits of her were published. With belief in pig-faced women commonplace, showmen exhibited living "pig-faced women" at fairs. These may have not been genuine women, but shaven bears dressed in women's clothing [ citation needed]. Due to its detailed descriptions of violent and some-times disturbing crimes, it was banned in Ireland by the Committee on Evil Literature in 1926.Begg and Bennett, p.10; Rubenhold, p.8; Judith Walkowitz, City of dreadful delight: narratives of sexual danger in late-Victorian London, (London : Virago, 1992), p . 195. Whilst Moore did not hurt any of his fellow passengers, it was said the had ‘stepped out of a carriage on to the footboard and peered into the next compartment in which were seated a man and woman.’ But as the new century rolled around, crimes continued to be committed on the railways. On 19 March 1901 the Dundee Evening Post pictured 23-year-old George Henry Parker, who was due to be executed for the murder of ‘gentleman-farmer’ William Pearson, which he had committed on the London and South-Western Railway. The theory that the succession of murders which have lately been committed in Whitechapel are the work of a lunatic appears to us to be by no means at present well established. We can quite understand the necessity for any murderer endeavouring to obliterate by the death of his victim his future identification as a burglar. Moreover, as far as we are aware, homicidal mania is generally characterised by the one single and fatal act, although we grant this may have been led up to by a deep-rooted series of delusions. It is most unusual for a lunatic to plan any complicated crime of this kind. Neither, as a rule, does a lunatic take precautions to escape from the consequences of his act; which data are most conspicuous in these now too celebrated cases. The truth is, that under the circumstances nobody can do more than hazard a guess as to the possible condition of mind of the perpetrator of these terrible tragedies. Until more evidence is forthcoming, it appears to us to be useless to speculate upon what can only at present be regarded as problematical. This would continue with the illustrations that the News published to accompany its coverage of the murder of Mary Nichols, which took place in the early hours of August 31st, 1888. The Report on the Murder of Mary Nichols THE ANNIE CHAPMAN ILLUSTRATIONS
Great Deal 
New Comment